<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hydrogen Airship Fantasy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.airships.net/blog/hydrogen-airship-nonsense/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.airships.net/blog/hydrogen-airship-nonsense</link>
	<description>The Graf Zeppelin, Hindenburg, U.S. Navy Airships, and other Dirigibles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:03:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian Vogt</title>
		<link>http://www.airships.net/blog/hydrogen-airship-nonsense#comment-16783</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Vogt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airships.net/?p=6240#comment-16783</guid>
		<description>Bist Du der Michael von Cl ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bist Du der Michael von Cl ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Design Lover</title>
		<link>http://www.airships.net/blog/hydrogen-airship-nonsense#comment-8493</link>
		<dc:creator>Design Lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airships.net/?p=6240#comment-8493</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post. I&#039;m totally into design, and follow eductation for it here in Arnhem (Holland). Keep up the good work! I&#039;ll keep following posts on this blog.

Cheers from Holland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post. I&#8217;m totally into design, and follow eductation for it here in Arnhem (Holland). Keep up the good work! I&#8217;ll keep following posts on this blog.</p>
<p>Cheers from Holland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.airships.net/blog/hydrogen-airship-nonsense#comment-7732</link>
		<dc:creator>James Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airships.net/?p=6240#comment-7732</guid>
		<description>Hi folks,
  The situation in Google search for airship is getting worse, if you look at page one there is only Airship Ventures (Who are friends of Google owners) on page 1, to represent actual airship companies with a real airship. Apart from high profile information sites there seem to be more spam, scam and virtual world only airship company sites than real ones. Seymour Powell is a joke in comparison with the main offenders who are busy trying to find investors to fleece with their vitual world or flying toy airship companies.
  Regards JB (LTA comedy www.hybridblimp.net )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi folks,<br />
  The situation in Google search for airship is getting worse, if you look at page one there is only Airship Ventures (Who are friends of Google owners) on page 1, to represent actual airship companies with a real airship. Apart from high profile information sites there seem to be more spam, scam and virtual world only airship company sites than real ones. Seymour Powell is a joke in comparison with the main offenders who are busy trying to find investors to fleece with their vitual world or flying toy airship companies.<br />
  Regards JB (LTA comedy <a href="http://www.hybridblimp.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.hybridblimp.net</a> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy M</title>
		<link>http://www.airships.net/blog/hydrogen-airship-nonsense#comment-6324</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airships.net/?p=6240#comment-6324</guid>
		<description>Someone really needs to edit the wikipedia page for it, otherwise many people could be caught out - whoever wrote it up neglected to mention any of this, or just didn&#039;t know. Unfortunately I can&#039;t do it as I have no experience editing wikipedia pages. So someone out there, fix those facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone really needs to edit the wikipedia page for it, otherwise many people could be caught out &#8211; whoever wrote it up neglected to mention any of this, or just didn&#8217;t know. Unfortunately I can&#8217;t do it as I have no experience editing wikipedia pages. So someone out there, fix those facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.airships.net/blog/hydrogen-airship-nonsense#comment-4850</link>
		<dc:creator>James Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 05:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airships.net/?p=6240#comment-4850</guid>
		<description>Good stuff,
  I will go back to watching their news today! Much better than the BBC who banned me from comments or blogs for including a web site link. I had to change my e mail address and switch IP as a result. Not posting to them again.
  Regards JB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff,<br />
  I will go back to watching their news today! Much better than the BBC who banned me from comments or blogs for including a web site link. I had to change my e mail address and switch IP as a result. Not posting to them again.<br />
  Regards JB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.airships.net/blog/hydrogen-airship-nonsense#comment-4847</link>
		<dc:creator>James Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 04:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airships.net/?p=6240#comment-4847</guid>
		<description>Very true!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.airships.net/blog/hydrogen-airship-nonsense#comment-4846</link>
		<dc:creator>James Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 04:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airships.net/?p=6240#comment-4846</guid>
		<description>Hi folks,
  The Zeppelin NT is an interesting airship to fly and I thought the year I spent flying one does add to a CV. BUT you have to be realistic that after I assisted DZR to sell the no 2 NT to the NEC in Japan, where the advertising budgets are very high and passengers will pay very high ticket prices, the NEC, a very experienced airship operator in Japan, went bust recently for 15 million dollars, the biggest one airship operator failure in history. Only the military could fund the development of such an expensive type of airship, but they were not interested and only mega rich friends of Google can afford to buy one.
  The fastest airship in the world is in reality the Skyship 600L (Lycoming engines) that can do 70 kts as it has 600 hp (2 times 300) with a volume of 7100 cu mtrs, the NT has 3 times 200 hp engines, but a volume of 8800 cu mtrs. Steve was a great pilot, but only he was willing to pay the FIA fees involved for the record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi folks,<br />
  The Zeppelin NT is an interesting airship to fly and I thought the year I spent flying one does add to a CV. BUT you have to be realistic that after I assisted DZR to sell the no 2 NT to the NEC in Japan, where the advertising budgets are very high and passengers will pay very high ticket prices, the NEC, a very experienced airship operator in Japan, went bust recently for 15 million dollars, the biggest one airship operator failure in history. Only the military could fund the development of such an expensive type of airship, but they were not interested and only mega rich friends of Google can afford to buy one.<br />
  The fastest airship in the world is in reality the Skyship 600L (Lycoming engines) that can do 70 kts as it has 600 hp (2 times 300) with a volume of 7100 cu mtrs, the NT has 3 times 200 hp engines, but a volume of 8800 cu mtrs. Steve was a great pilot, but only he was willing to pay the FIA fees involved for the record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerin</title>
		<link>http://www.airships.net/blog/hydrogen-airship-nonsense#comment-4301</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 16:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airships.net/?p=6240#comment-4301</guid>
		<description>Turtle Airships, Skycat, Cargolifter, Aereon-26, how many times must we fail before we ACTUALLY succeed in building a noteworthy rigid airship? I pray to GOD that the Sunship and Aeroscraft ML-866 pan out because both have a pre-existing companies backing them instead of hot air, pardon the pun. Not to mention they aren&#039;t as big as the SS United States(Hi dynalifter), at 120 and 210 feet, respectively. Cross your fingers, everyone! And don&#039;t forget your tickets!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turtle Airships, Skycat, Cargolifter, Aereon-26, how many times must we fail before we ACTUALLY succeed in building a noteworthy rigid airship? I pray to GOD that the Sunship and Aeroscraft ML-866 pan out because both have a pre-existing companies backing them instead of hot air, pardon the pun. Not to mention they aren&#8217;t as big as the SS United States(Hi dynalifter), at 120 and 210 feet, respectively. Cross your fingers, everyone! And don&#8217;t forget your tickets!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hopp</title>
		<link>http://www.airships.net/blog/hydrogen-airship-nonsense#comment-4166</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hopp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 19:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airships.net/?p=6240#comment-4166</guid>
		<description>Beautiful idea, poor design. I&#039;d seen this myself a while back, and the first thing that I thought was &quot;How terribly un-aerodynamic.&quot;

The second thing I thought was &quot;Hydrogen?! That can&#039;t be right...&quot;

Yet again, great idea but poor concept. Just like that Soviet design that had virtually no room for gas cells...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful idea, poor design. I&#8217;d seen this myself a while back, and the first thing that I thought was &#8220;How terribly un-aerodynamic.&#8221;</p>
<p>The second thing I thought was &#8220;Hydrogen?! That can&#8217;t be right&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Yet again, great idea but poor concept. Just like that Soviet design that had virtually no room for gas cells&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cary Cupka</title>
		<link>http://www.airships.net/blog/hydrogen-airship-nonsense#comment-3875</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary Cupka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airships.net/?p=6240#comment-3875</guid>
		<description>Add to your list of &quot;gullible&quot; media outlets non other than the Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA). Their April 2010 issue of Sport Pilot carried a news clip titled &quot;Airship promises green luxury airship travel&quot; on page 16 in the Aeroinnovations section highlighting &quot;cutting edge developments.&quot; 

I reckon they might as well have said &quot;Airship promises heaven on earth.&quot; I could jump off here into a little &quot;harmless&quot; cynicism of my own, but I&#039;ll spare your readers the venting.

Thanks for helping me come back from my little flight of fancy. Now I have to go around recovering my integrity with everyone I talked to about this in my social circles....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add to your list of &#8220;gullible&#8221; media outlets non other than the Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA). Their April 2010 issue of Sport Pilot carried a news clip titled &#8220;Airship promises green luxury airship travel&#8221; on page 16 in the Aeroinnovations section highlighting &#8220;cutting edge developments.&#8221; </p>
<p>I reckon they might as well have said &#8220;Airship promises heaven on earth.&#8221; I could jump off here into a little &#8220;harmless&#8221; cynicism of my own, but I&#8217;ll spare your readers the venting.</p>
<p>Thanks for helping me come back from my little flight of fancy. Now I have to go around recovering my integrity with everyone I talked to about this in my social circles&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

