Graf Zeppelin Design and Technology
The design and construction of Graf Zeppelin were essentially conservative, based on tried-and-true technology developed over the Zeppelin Company’s decades of experience, and the ship was constructed of triangular Duralumin girders, with frames (or “rings”) spaced 15 meters apart.
The Limited Shape and Size of Graf Zeppelin
The shape and size of Graf Zeppelin was not ideal aerodynamically (in terms of performance), structurally (in terms of strength), or economically (in terms of payload).
The design of the ship was determined — and limited — by the size of the construction shed at Friedrichshafen, which had inner dimensions of 787 feet in length and 115 feet in height.
Since greater size meant greater efficiency in long distance operation, the challenge for Ludwig Durr and his design team was to create a ship with the largest possible gas capacity that could be built within the confines of the construction shed:
The Graf Zeppelin's hull was the largest shape that could be built within the rectangular limits of the Friedrichshafen construction shed. The ship was designed to have the maximum gas-carrying capacity that could be built with the limits of the shed.
The ship they designed was a long, thin cylinder, 776 feet long and 100 feet in diameter, with a gondola situated far forward, so that it could be slung under the hull where it began to rise toward the bow. The height of the ship from the bottom of the gondola to the top of the hull was 110 feet, just barely clearing the arches of the shed.
LZ-127’s long, slim hull was not the most aerodynamically efficient shape (which was a lesson learned from the efficient teardrop design of Bodensee and Nordstern); it was not the most structurally effective shape (since the thin hull was vulnerable to bending stresses); and it was not the most economically practical design (since its relatively small size limited payload on long flights), but it was the best that could be achieved within the limitations of the hangar at Friedrichshafen.
Keel of Graf Zeppelin, showing traditional triangular girder construction. (click all photos to enlarge.)
The Use of Blau Gas
But Graf Zeppelin did incorporate one especially notable innovation, in the use of Blau gas fuel for its five engines. One of the challenges of lighter-than-air powered flight has always been the need to account for the loss of weight as fuel is burned by the ship’s engines. As gasoline or diesel fuel is consumed during flight, the ship becomes lighter, and without a means to compensate for this change, lifting gas must be vented to maintain the ship’s equilibrium. The Zeppelin Company’s innovative solution to this issue with Graf Zeppelin was the use of a gaseous fuel, similar to propane, named Blau gas after its inventor, Dr Hermann Blau. Since Blau gas is similar in weight to air, its consumption during flight did not significantly change the aerostatic balance of the ship, and so it was not necessary to valve lifting gas to compensate for Blau gas burned by the engines.
Blau gas was also more efficient to carry than gasoline, and extended the ship’s range by over 30 hours of flying time; the approximately one million cubic feet of Blau gas carried by Graf Zeppelin could power the ship for over one hundred hours, but if that million cubic feet of Blau gas had been replaced by hydrogen, the additional hydrogen could have lifted only enough gasoline to power the ship for 70 hours or less.
The Blau gas was carried in 12 cells (Kraftgaszelle, or “power gas cells”), in the lower section of 12 of the ship’s 17 gas cell bays, beneath the hydrogen cells (Traggaszelle, or “lift gas cells”). Of Graf Zeppelin’s total gas capacity of 3,707,550 cubic feet, 1,059.300 cubic feet was available for Blau gas. The ship did also carry a supply of gasoline, so that if the ship were heavy, the engines could burn gasoline instead of Blau gas, lightening the ship without the need to drop ballast.
The use of Blau gas was quite hazardous, and many people believe Graf Zeppelin’s Blau gas presented a greater danger to safety than the ship’s hydrogen. The gas cells of that era were not impermeable and always leaked to some extent, and small tears and other minor leaks were also common. Since Blau gas has a similar density to air, escaping Blau gas did not rise like hydrogen but rather settled to the bottom of the hull, including the keel and into the gondola itself, and could even flow out toward the engines. This was an even bigger problem when the ship was on the ground, especially inside an enclosed hangar, since there was no flow of air to carry the gas away.
It should always be remembered that Graf Zeppelin was basically an experimental “proof of concept” design, and that the design of ship was limited by practical considerations such as the size of the construction shed at Friedrichshafen. While a clever response to these limitations in some ways, Blau gas had never before been used in a zeppelin, and it would never be used again.
Water Ballast
When it did become necessary to drop ballast to maintain equilibrium, Graf Zeppelin could look to the 17,640 lbs of water it carried as trim ballast, as well as up to 5,280 lbs of water as emergency ballast, and 3,520 lbs of water carried for drinking, cooking, and washing (which was kept on board after use).
Graf Zeppelin was powered by five Maybach VL-2 12-cylinder engines, which could develop 550hp at maximum revolutions, and 450 hp at 1400 RPM in cruise.
Typical Speed and Altitude
The ship typically cruised at 72 MPH, at an altitude of 650 feet above ground level, but it also flew as high as 6,000 feet on occasion (for example, when crossing the Stanovoy mountain range in far eastern Russia during its Round-the-World flight). Graf Zeppelin also cruised well below 650 feet when necessary, as it was German practice to reduce the stress of vertical gusts by flying low to the ground during storms when possible.









{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }
Wow, where did you get these photos? I have a shelf full of zeppelin books and have never seen these. That closeup of the cover stitching and the room full of engine pods under construction… amazing!
I’ve always wished that someone with a bunch of money would build a real zeppelin using the traditional methods and make a museum out of it. It wouldn’t even need to fly and portions of the covering on one side could be left off to display the framework. Imagine what an amazing sight that would be. I wonder if there are enough records of the original construction techniques to even make that possible?
[Reply]
What a pity we no longer have Zeppelins able to carry passengers trans-continentally-a loss of a charactered form of travel as was the demise of flying-boats, and if one had to travel by conventional aircraft, the passing of the great airliners of the piston engine era-DC6’s, Constellations, Stratocruisers. The modern jet airliner may be faster and safer, but is not a pleasant travel experience compared to what we have lost.
One major disadvantage of the Graf Zeppelin was its lack of cabin heating-trips on the North Atlantic Route must have been chilling, as Lady Grace Drummond-Hay notes. Did any airships of the era have heating? R100/101?
[Reply]
Dan (Airships.net) Reply:
March 2nd, 2010 at 5:32 pm
Hindenburg’s passenger area was heated with air warmed by the cooling systems of the forward engines, and heating was added to Graf Zeppelin’s lounge later in the ship’s career.
[Reply]
Jon Kent Reply:
March 3rd, 2010 at 3:48 am
Thanks for that information Dan-fantastic site by the way-I knew Hindenberg was heated, but interested that Graf Zeppelin was in passenger lounge latterly (or Drawing Room as Lady Grace Drummond May charmingly says). I was wondering if R101 or R100 were though. Probably not? To return to Hindenberg’s heating, it must have been rather primitive and combined with the passenger cabins being inside the hull, rather than the Graf Zeppelin’s gondola with windows for the cabins, making them either too hot when working or too cold when not…
[Reply]
what was the fabric used on the skin and what was the dope used?
[Reply]
In my eighties and still love airships. Thank you for the info and owing to the world situation, airships will in many years to come will be the thing of the future
[Reply]
It seems strange to have an odd number of engines (5). There must have been three on one side and two on the other. Didn’t this make the airship want to go round in circles because of the unbalanced thrust? And wouldn’t the weight distribution be out of balance?
[Reply]
Dan (Airships.net) Reply:
February 9th, 2010 at 5:34 am
One was along the centerline, aft of the gondola.
[Reply]
i am an air ship fanatic my self and have a great interest in them and wish they would bring them back did you Know that in one hours flight a modern jet uses the same amount of fuel that it would take an airship to travel several thousand miles so with all the quests of finding more economical means of travel i dont know why they dont any ideas?
[Reply]
stolennomenclature Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 2:16 am
You have to consider not just the amount of fuel used, but the number of passengers carried and the time taken per flight. The unknown jet you are using for the comparison might use 4 times as much fuel but carry 4 times as many passengers. It will likely travel at least 4 times as fast, so be able to make four times as many flights in the same time period, and so one plane will do the same job as four airships. In addition, the plane will require a much smaller crew, less food, etc. All these things have to be taken into account to.
[Reply]
wONDERFUL PICTURES AND COMMENTS. i WATCHED THE MACON AND AKRON
ON THEIR TEST FLIGHTS.I ALSO HELPED IN PRODUCING THE ENVELOPES OF
THE L AND K SHIPS OF WW2 BEFORE I JOINED THE NAVY IN LTA.GOODYEAR
HAS BEEN GOOD TO ME IN AKRON,OHIO.
[Reply]
rick faust Reply:
February 11th, 2010 at 9:38 am
would love to find out more about your work on the cells for the ships please contact me rick
[Reply]
Wie kan mij de namen van de bemanning en hun fuctie van de Grafzeppelin bezorgen.Bedankt
[Reply]
já imaginou, reduzir todo peso supérfluo, (decoração desnecessária), pé direito menor e outros ‘enxugamentos’ no peso bruto do dirigível, e transportar milhares de litros de água para combater incêndios em qualquer local do planeta? eu imagino isto desde 1977.
[Reply]
i love this airship
[Reply]
That picture of the Graf with the skin not completely on during construction raises a question: was the skin of the ship applied in sections or is it one continuous piece of fabric?
Thanks!
[Reply]
Dan (Airships.net) Reply:
June 15th, 2009 at 8:26 am
Thanks for your question, Tael.
The covering was applied in rectangular sections which were stitched to the framework, and then the separate panels were connected with a strip of fabric and the whole covering was doped to make it water-tight. This photo illustrated the separate panels attached to the framework, and a strip of connecting fabric joining the sections:
[Reply]
fantastic good this site. Ever in my life I was a fan of airships, a dream of a peaceful world. A shame that the projekt “Cargo lifter” was stopped. A lot of small shareholders lost money (me). The hangar is sold to a korean investor and is now used as a tropical recreation bath. However, good ideas seems to be also lighter than air.
But your site is top
[Reply]
Thank You so much ! !
— Wonderfull photos and info !
[Reply]