“The Hindenburg” (1975): Fact & Fiction

dvd-coverThe Hindenburg is a 1975 film directed by Robert Wise about the German zeppelin Hindenburg and the Hindenburg disaster of May 6, 1937.

The basic plot of the movie — that the zeppelin was sabotaged by an anti-Nazi crew member — is entirely fictional, but the film’s detailed sets and its depiction of life on board the airship are remarkably accurate.

The movie was part of the 1970’s “Disaster Film” genre which included Airport (1970), The Poseidon Adventure (1972), The Towering Inferno (1974), and Earthquake (1974).  The Hindenburg follows the “Grand Hotel” formula, which involves a large cast of characters whose stories and subplots are revealed as the film moves toward a dramatic conclusion.  Most of the characters in the film are based on historical figures, who have been dramatized with considerable poetic license in some cases.

The Main Characters

Colonel Franz Ritter (George C. Scott)

Based on Colonel Fritz Erdmann

Fritz Erdmann and "Franz Ritter"

Fritz Erdmann | “Franz Ritter”

The character of Franz Ritter is based on Luftwaffe Colonel Fritz Erdmann, but unlike the fictional Ritter, there is no evidence that Col. Erdmann had any duties relating to security during Hindenburg’s last flight.  It was common practice for both German and American military officers to fly aboard Hindenburg to study flight operations, navigation procedures, and weather forecasting techniques, and there is no reason to believe that Erdmann had any other function during the flight.  (Erdmann was commandant of the aviation section of the German Military Signal Communications School, in Halle an der Saal, and was accompanied on Hindenburg’s last flight by two other Luftwaffe officers, Major Hans-Hugo Witt and Lieutenant Claus Hinkelbein.)

One incident in the film does mirror historical fact; shortly before departure, Erdmann did summon his wife to the ship for one final farewell.

  • Update, 5 June 2015:  Earlier versions of the screenplay called this character Kessler; it was changed to Ritter shortly before filming.

Joseph Goebbels: “There is no resistance movement, Colonel!”
Colonel Ritter: “That’s reassuring… coming from the Minister of Propaganda.”

Ursula, the Countess (Anne Bancroft)


“Göring adores it”

Fictional Character

Some commentators have compared the Countess to passenger Margaret Mather, but there is little to connect the two women; the Countess was a sexy German woman traveling to visit her daughter, while Miss Mather was a sprightly but 58-year old American who never married or had children.  But both the fictional Countess and the real-life Margaret Mather escaped the disaster simply by walking down the passsenger boarding steps as the burning zeppelin reached the ground.

And in one other matter, the Countess was true to history:  Göring did adore it.

The Countess:  “Oh Franz… If I told you what was going on at Peenemünde...”

Karl Boerth (William Atherton)

Based on Erich Spehl

Erich Spehl and "Karl Boerth"

Erich Spehl | “Karl Boerth”

The most inaccurate and unfair portrayal of the film is that of “Karl Boerth,” who is based on rigger Erich Spehl.  The film, and the book on which it was based, depict Boerth/Spehl as a saboteur who caused the disaster.  In reality, there is not the slightest piece of meaningful evidence that Spehl was in any way responsible for the tragedy.

Karl Boerth: “My duty, Sir.”

Martin Vögel (Roy Thinnes)

Fictional Character

The fictional Martin Vogel is the villain of The Hindenburg; a Gestapo officer posing as the ship’s photographer.  Hindenburg did have a semi-official photographer aboard its final flight, a 28-year old photographer from Bonn named Karl Otto Clemens, who agreed to take publicity photographs for the Deutsche Zeppelin-Reederei in return for half-price fare across the Atlantic.  But there is no reason to believe that the real Clemens was in any way associated with the Gestapo, or that would have needed cologne more than anybody else.

Martin Vögel: “I have a date with my little Jewish model.  I am curious to try one before they’re all gone.”

The Officers and Crew

Captain Ernst Lehman (Richard Dysart)

Historical Character

Captain Ernst Lehmann

Captain Ernst Lehmann

Captain Ernst Lehmann was an experienced zeppelin commander who was aboard Hindenburg as director of the German Zeppelin Transport Company (Deutsche Zeppelin-Reederei). But while the film portrays Lehmann as being hostile to the National Socialist regime (“Dr. Eckener and I are out of favor at the Chancellery”), the opposite was true, and the historical Lehmann was known for his cooperation with the Nazis.  Lehmann was named director of the Nazified Reederei because of his willingness to work with the Hitler regime, and he famously risked the safety of the Hindenburg to please the Nazis by making a propaganda flight in March, 1936.

The film’s Lehmann is on a mission to obtain helium, but the historical Lehmann somewhat arrogantly dismissed the need for helium, arguing, according to Zeppelin official Willy von Meister, that the Germans “have been operating our commercial service with hydrogen very successfully for years.”

Ernst Lehmann: “We’ve been in no danger. The ship is completely bonded together.”

Captain Max Pruss (Charles Durning)

Historical Character

Captain Max Pruss

Captain Max Pruss

Captain Max Pruss was in command of Hindenburg on the ship’s final flight. Like his character in the film, the historical Pruss was known for his sardonic and even sarcastic comments, but he was also admired for treating his subordinates with fairness and respect.

The film shows Pruss rejecting the advice and recommendations of the senior Lehmann (“I’ll do the worrying this trip, Captain”), but it is unlikely the real Pruss would have treated Lehmann so dismissively, and it is possible, in fact, that Pruss deferred significant operational control to Lehmann during Hindenburg’s ill-fated landing attempt at Lakehurst.

Max Pruss: “Thank you very kindly, I thought it was a Christmas tree.”

Dimmler (Rex Holman)

Historical Figure

Wilhelm Dimmler

Wilhelm Dimmler

There was an officer named Wilhelm Dimmler aboard the Hindenburg, but unlike his movie counterpart, the real Dimmler was an engineering officer who worked in the hull of the airship, and not a watch officer who worked in the control car as depicted in the movie.

Stewardess Imhof (Betsy Jones-Moreland)

Historical Figure

Emilie Imhoff

Emilie Imhoff

Emilie Imhof was the world’s first and only airship stewardess. She was probably located in the area of the B Deck passenger cabins at the time of the accident, and she was killed in the crash.

Rigger Knorr (Ted Gehring)

Historical Figure

"Ludwig Knorr"

“Ludwig Knorr”

The Ludwig Knorr of the movie is a depicted as a lower-ranking crew member, who is obsequious toward the ship’s officers (“Please forgive my appearance, Captain”), but the historical Ludwig Knorr was Hindenburg’s Chief Rigger and one of the most senior and respected members of the crew, having been a rigger since 1912.

The film’s Knorr has a knife with “a nick in the guard from that fight we got in in Shanghai when we went around the world in the Graf.” The real Knorr did, in fact, travel around the world in the Graf Zeppelin in 1929, but the ship never landed in China. (And as observant movie watchers will notice, it was the blade of the knife, and not the guard, which was lost.)

Knorr did participate in a dangerous, in-flight repair of a zeppelin’s covering as depicted in the film, but the incident took place aboard LZ-127 Graf Zeppelin in 1928, and not the Hindenburg in 1937.

Graf Zeppelin repair, 1938; "Hindenburg repair, 1937"

Graf Zeppelin repair, 1928 | “Hindenburg repair, 1937”

Knorr: “Arrest me captain? Because my knife was borrowed?”

Cabin Boy

Based on Werner Franz

Werner Franz

Werner Franz

Hindenburg did have a cabin boy to assist the stewards; 14-year old Werner Franz, who was almost trapped on the wreckage but miraculously survived the disaster when he was drenched by water from a broken tank or pipe above him.

The Passengers

The Breslau Family


The Breslau Family: All-American and 1/4 Jewish

Based on the Doehner Family

  • Hermann Doehner
  • Matilde Doehner
  • Irene Doehner
  • Walter Doehner
  • Werner Doehner
The Doehner Family: Herman, Matilde, Irene, and Walter & Werner giving Hitler Salute

The Doehner Family: Germans in Mexico.  Walter & Werner give the Hitler Salute.

The five members of the Breslau family seem to parallel the Doehner family, but while the fictional Mr. Breslau was an American with a Jewish grandmother (“Mrs. Milstein”), whose children were all “born in the States” (“A couple of cowboys,” as Col. Ritter calls the two Breslau boys), the Doehners were a Volksdeutsche (ethnic German) family living in Mexico who felt a close connection with their German homeland; home movies show the Doehner children giving the stiff-armed Nazi salute.

Mrs. Breslau:  “I still say the French Line has the best society.”

Joe Spah (Robert Clary)

Historical Character

The historical and fictional Spähs greeting their wives

The historical and fictional Spähs greeting their wives

Acrobat Joseph Spah, who performed under the stage name “Ben Dova” (it was a more innocent time), was returning to the United States with his Alsatian dog, Ulla.  Ulla spent the flight in a freight room toward the tail of the ship, and Späh’s unaccompanied trips through the hull to visit his dog caused Hindenburg Captain Max Pruss and Chief Steward Heinrich Kubis later to suggest that he might have been responsible for the fire, which began near Ulla’s cage.  Lakehurst commander Charles Rosendahl was also influenced by these suggestions, and encouraged the FBI to investigate Spah. After an extensive investigation, the the FBI concluded there was no reason to believe Späh had anything to do with the accident, and of course Pruss, who commanded the ship, and Rosendahl, who recommended landing during electrically charged conditions, both had a strong personal incentive to blame the disaster on something other than their own decisions.

Joseph Spah: “Oh goody, we are going to play doctor.”

Edward Douglas (Gig Young)

Historical Character

Edward Douglas

Edward Douglas

The real Edward Douglas, like his movie counterpart, was an advertising man specializing in the automobile industry.  Douglas was based in Frankfurt as Director of European Operations for the McCann/Erickson advertising agency, where he worked for General Motors, but the movie’s subplot, involving coded telegrams and a race to beat a competitor to New York, was completely fictional.

Edward Douglas:  “Here’s my special pass”

Eliot Howell III (Colby Chester)

Based on Peter Belin Jr.

Peter Belin, Jr. and Eliot Howell, III

Peter Belin, Jr. | Eliot Howell, III

Ivy Leaguer Eliot Howell III is based on 24-year old Ferdinand Lammot “Peter” Belin Jr.  But while the real Peter Belin was a graduate of Yale, when Major Napier asks Eliot Howell if he will “defend the honor of Old Eli” by betting that Mr. Breslau’s pen will stand in the bar, Howell replies “It’s Harvard,” to which Napier guilefully replies: “the gentleman from Yale wagers $100.00!”

Emilio Pajetta (Burgess Meredith) and Major Napier (Rene Auberjonois)

Fictional Characters


Mr. Pajetta, Major Napier, and Colonel Ritter

Major Napier:  “Do you know this ruddy blimp is filled with hydrogen?
Colonel Ritter: “I’ll make a note of that.”

Reed Channing (Peter Donat) and Mrs. Channing (Joanna Moore)

Fictional Characters


"Reed Channing" and Joseph Spah

Some commentators have seen a similarity between the Channings and real-life passengers Leonhard and Getrud Adelt, but other than being a husband-and-wife involved in a creative field, there is little similarity.  The Adelts were German writers and journalists; Leonhard had collaborated with Ernst Lehmann on his autobiography, and the Adelts were flying on the Hindenburg as guests of Captain Lehmann and the DZR.  The fictional Channings are a well-to-do American couple, and the husband is a theatrical producer.

In the film, Reed Channing plays the piano during an anti-Nazi concert with fellow passenger Joseph Spah.  While Hindenburg did carry an aluminum piano the previous year, the piano was not aboard the zeppelin during its last flight, and the concert, of course, was just a Hollywood device to make it more palatable for modern audiences to watch a movie set aboard a Nazi airship.

Reed Channing:  “OK… You’re the captain… you want a concert, I’ll give you a concert.”

Other Historical Characters

Dr. Eckener (Herbert Nelson)

Historical Figure

Dr. Hugo Eckener

Dr. Hugo Eckener

Hugo Eckener was the internationally respected leader of the Zeppelin enterprise who, as depicted in the film, was known for his hostility to the Nazi regime.

The movie-Eckener claims he is out of favor with the Nazi government because he refused to name the airship after the Führer, but in fact Hitler never wanted the ship named for himself; he thought zeppelins were dangerous and did not want his name associated with an aircraft which might crash or burn.

Captain Fellows (Stephen Elliott)

Based on Charles Rosendahl

Charles Rosendahl and "Captain Fellows"

Charles Rosendahl | “Captain Fellows”

The character of Captain Fellows was based upon American naval officer Charles E. Rosendahl, the commanding officer of the Lakehurst Naval Air Station at the time of the Hindenburg disaster, who was still alive when the film was made in 1975.

Captain Fellows: “Flash red, dammit, flash red.”


17 Comments on "“The Hindenburg” (1975): Fact & Fiction"

  1. philip neuhaus | May 5, 2015 at 7:40 am | Reply

    was Rigger Neuhaus a real person on the Hindenburg?

    Rigger Neuhaus = Hans Freund ? who is real please


    Patrick Russell Reply:

    Hi Philip,

    The rigger named Neuhaus in the movie was a fictional character, invented for the film. The fact that he was called away from watching Cell 4 to “come bear a hand” with a jammed cable does draw a slight parallel between him and Hans Freund, who was a rigger on the Hindenburg’s actual last flight.

    During the Hindenburg’s final landing approach, Freund was standing at the aft end of the keel walkway, hauling a steel mooring cable up from its storage place in the lower fin so that he could lower it to the landing crew. The manila “hauling-up” line he was using to hoist the cable jammed between a pair of bracing wires and Freund called to one of the crewmen in the lower fin to help him pull the rope clear. This was perhaps a minute or two before the fire broke out.

    More on Freund can be found here:



  2. Jim Richardson | February 26, 2015 at 3:37 pm | Reply

    This comment is for Elke Borlund who left a comment about a year ago… looking for more information about actor Teno Pollick, who plays the small role of Frankel in the film and is (for me) rather hard to spot.
    There is not much known on Teno. What I know I gathered from the excellent biography on Tony Perkins, “Split Image” (rereleased under the title “Anthony Perkins”) by Charles Winecoff. The late Perkins and Pollick were lovers in the late fifties/ early sixties in NY. Pollick had found earlier success playing one of the Lost Boys in the Mary Martin “Peter Pan” when it ran on Broadway. From that point, his career was made up of guest roles and small supporting parts. “The Hindenburg” marked one of his last, if not the last, appearances. Supposedly he suffered health problems that resulted from a botched kidney operation and was in a lot of pain, and in need of a money. According to Perkin’s biography, the mother of Tony Perkins (Jane) had always kept in touch with Pollick long after her son’s romance was over and helped out with finances and medication for Pollick. By the book’s account, Pollick was devastated when Jane Perkin’s died and left him nothing or almost nothing in her will, as she had supposedly promised to look after him. It is speculated that she mollified Pollick throughout his life to keep him from trying to collect money by spilling the beans about Perkins’s private life when there would have been reason to. Who knows if that is true or not. Anyway, hope this sheds some light on the mystery man.


  3. Saw this film myself when it first came out. It spawned interest in lighter-than-air aviation, but due to the lack of enough availability of lighter-than-air craft, (as it was right around that time that Greedy Goodyear had stopped offering public (and lighter-than-air enthusiasts) flights in any of their Goodyear blimps!

    At present there is one (airworthy) airship near to me, near Mountain View, CA, from Zeppelin. This is relatively new airship out of three (other being in Friedrichshafen proper and somewhere based in Japan).

    I haven’t looked into one in Japan yet but ship at Moffett Field is TOO EXPENSIVE! $500 for half hour flight! I would LOVE to fly aboard her and book flight in ten billionth of atta-second (atta-second already being ten billionth of normal second — even that is way too slow for me), but I am considered ‘low income’ and simply cannot afford that sum of money!

    A friend of mine is boycotting flying in this ship (as much ass he too would like to fly) out of protest of people spending that sort of money in these bad economic times to where these funds can go towards helping others in need. (If I were lucky enough to win Lotto, then one of first things I would do is book flight at Moffett Field (or in Germany or Japan — probably Germany as that is first new ship since Hindenburg disaster and home of DZR). These new ships of course use state-of-the-art digital technology and are far safer than LZ-129 or earlier — and most important these three new ships utilise HELIUM! YES!


    Dan Grossman Reply:

    Unfortunately the zeppelin operation in California is now defunct.


    John Grabowski Reply:

    My wife booked a flight on board the Friedrichshafen ship as my first anniversary present. I asked her how much it cost 9in Euros, which were then about $1.25 to American) and she said i didn’t want to know!

    Amazing flight, though.


  4. Elke Borlund | March 26, 2014 at 1:25 pm | Reply

    A question: Is Teno Pollick the actor playing Helmsmen “Frankel”? I know Curt Lowens played “Elevator man” Felber. I watched this film a dozen times and would like to know more about Teno Pollick.


  5. Great homepage, I like the juxtaposition of film footage and real life pictures…

    About the “Führerstand”: As a native german speaker I can assure you that it simply means “cab” or “control cabin”. It has nothing to do whatsoever with “Führer” Adolf Hitler. About the missing swastika emblems on the fins: That is one of those cases where historical accuracy is sacrificed for political correctness. In Germany it is against the law to display it in public, that is why it is retouched from picture sometimes. E.G. I have a book about Hindenburg with an illustration by Ken Marshall on the cover, the red square is there, the white roundel is there, the swastika is missing- It is the same with modelling kits marketed around here…
    About the new German made Hindenburg film of 2011. It is absolute shit IMHO. Not only is it laboriously written and acted, the sets sacrificed historical facts for dramatic purposes or even just better lighting. The small cabins were transformed into huge staterooms with huge windows, WTH? The worst thing is the soundtrack, who,for the love of god, would include modern pop songs in a movie that takes place in 1937? To sum it up, for me there is just one movie, the 1975 one, the new one doesn’t deserve to be watched


  6. I just have to say I sat through this movie once again. The quality of the DVD I have is spotty at best. Excluding the cheesy melodrama, it was great to watch the recreated sets of the ship and of the interiors. Truly a fantastic job recreating the great ship.


  7. A great website and great photo’s and descriptions – thank you for all your hard work.

    The similarities between the actors and actual persons is very striking. the art direction on the film was excellent. All performances were absolutely believable.


  8. Hi, there were some additional things about fictional characters and I need to ask some questions about the cast/characters.

    Emilio Pajetta = Nelson Morris
    Maj. Napier = Burtis J. Dolan (goes by the name Maj. Dolan in the Michael Mooney book)
    Chief Steward Hirsch = Heinrich Kubis
    Eleanore Ritter = Dorothea Erdmann
    Ludecke = Walter Ziegler, Helmut Lau, and Chief Engineer Rudolf Sauter
    Rigger Neuhaus = Hans Freund

    I know Frankel was the helmsman, but does he survive the fire?

    What were the roles of Lt. Truscott and Lt. Lombardi? Were they Detectives or at Lakehurst?

    There’s this actor named Larry Moran, he plays Helmut / is he the cabin boy?

    Was Kathie Rauch a historical person?


    Chris Reply:

    Having seen the movie far too many times 😉 I think I can answer some of your questions here:

    Chief Steward Hirsch would definitely be based on real-life Chief Steward Kubis.
    Col. Ritter’s wife and & Mrs. Erdmann – same.

    I have never read anything to indicate that either Nelson Morris or Burtis Dolan were “card sharks” so I’m fairly certain those two charcters (Napier & Pajetta) were totally fictional.

    Ludecke…definitely was a rigger in the film (was one of the riggers tasked with patching the Hindenburg’s fin mid-flight). The film depicted four riggers, but there were only three on the real flight – two died and the one who survived (Freund) was in the tail. Ludecke is killed in the fire, having been sent to the nose with the others off-watch to trim the ship, so I’m pretty sure his character was also made up.

    Rigger Neuhaus = Hans Freund

    Lt. Hank Truscott, US Navy, was based on real-life Lt. George Watson, who worked at Lakehurst with Charles Rosendahl / Captain Fellows in the lighter-than-air division, and served as the Navy public relations officer on May 6. Lt. Lombardi – no idea except that he represented any number of security detail who were at the field for the landing.

    There was, indeed, a Kathie Rauch of Milwaukee, Wisconson, and the letter was real. And she claimed to be clairvoyant. All of this in the film is true.

    Helmut…now that’s a new one on me, and I also saw it on IMDB. However, Larry Moran would have been just 6 or 7 years old at the time of the film’s production, so it must have been an obscure bit part (guess I’ll have to see the movie a few more times & look for him!)

    No idea if Frankel survived the fire, would have been nice to see a more complete follow-up on who actually survived or was killed other than the photo montage at the end, but then it would have been longer…


  9. It was a long time since I saw this move, but didn’t it include the Horst Wessel song with fictional english lyrics to sound more sinister?

    Frank Tonge, the word should be “Führerstand” which means “drivers stand/cabin”.


  10. great comparison! like it!
    thanx for post! 🙂


  11. Hi! As a stamp enthusiast I am creating an album on Zeppelins printed by the various countries. I have a souvenir stamp sheet from Mauritania issued in 1976. On the stamp the ship shown is claimed to be L-129 flying over the Berlin Olympic Stadium in 1936. There appear to be two inaccuracies.
    1–There is no swastika shown on the fin. This does not correspond with your article’s photo. 2–On the gondola shown lower on the sheet the bow shows the name “Fuhrersland. ” Was this correct or a figment of the designer’s imagination?
    I think your site is fantastic, you did a great job clearing up some of my misconceptions. Thank you!


    Dan (Airships.net) Reply:

    LZ-129 carried swastika flags on its fins throughout its career, so any image of LZ-129 without them is inaccurate.

    I have never heard the term “Fuhrersland” in connection with LZ-129. I would be interested to see the stamps you mentioned.


    Frank Tonge Reply:

    Thank you for the information. I do not know how to upload the stamp images to this site. Perhaps you could enlighten me, or provide an email address that is compatible.
    Best wishes, Frank


  12. Chris Thomas | July 22, 2010 at 6:45 pm | Reply

    Even after all these years I cant seem to find anyone younger than 80 years of age that collects, knows of or will share interest in the hindenburg. Even those few wont speak or share.

    I kinda feel alone in my interest. My search for a Hinderburg Item has left me discouraged year after year and my search for another person in TEXAS who shares the same interest or hobby cant be found.. Do you live here? I would love to talk more with you and see what materials you have gathered or at least pictures?



  13. For those interested, the soundtrack by David Shires is now available on a limited edition CD and it is rather good. It can still be found on various site around the web.


    John Grabowski Reply:

    Yes, I agree it’s very good and feel Shire is an underrated composer. Unfortunately, he composed this score the same year as John Williams wrote the famous music to Jaws.


  14. It’s amazing what you can miss when you watch a movie just the once. Some of those quotes are rather good for what is a fairly routine disaster flick.


  15. Well written, Dan,

    I have been also trying to separate some of the inaccuracies in the film.

    As shown in your picture the lower fin is more cramped and there is no set of stairs towards the keel walkway; there was a vertical ladder.

    Spah is actually called “Spahn” in the movie, and he doesn’t have a dog. The Channings have a dalmatian and Mrs. Channing is pregnant. Obviously no passenger was pregnant on the flight. The Channings’ dog survives in the film (!) because Boerth lets her walk out of her cage.

    The movie is obviously fictional, but I just like watching it for its visuals. They make the airship look so real using the model and matte paintings. I can’t believe they were done before there was CGI. it’s better than having Red Vision do visuals for Hindenburg Documentaries LOL They’ve done like 3 documentaries but never perfectly accurate. The model in the movie isn’t perfect (funny somewhat distorted nose shape a few other small errors etc.) but it’s one of the best representations I’ve seen.

    There’s a 1929 short film called The Lost Zeppelin, based upon the crash of the Italia; for its age its visuals are also pretty cool.


    Patrick Russell Reply:

    Actually, I’m fairly sure that the only instance in the movie in which Spah is referred to as “Spahn” is in that newspaper headline that he shows to the SS officer when he arrives at the airfield. Other than that, he’s consistently referred to as “Spah”.

    They definitely redesigned the interior of the lower fin to accommodate the stairway, which was added for dramatic purposes. The width of the fin’s interior may have been increased slightly, but not by much. What mostly makes it look more spacious in the movie is the lighting.

    Another area of the ship that wasn’t completely accurate was the mooring area in the bow, although this is understandable because there really haven’t ever been many reference photos available for that part of the ship. They got it relatively close, though, with a main mooring platform (where Boerth and Ritter sit when they first talk about the bomb plot) and smaller secondary platforms for the landing rope coils below and to the sides of the aft end of the main platform. The hand crank on the forward end of the axial girder makes a brief appearance in the scene in which Vogel and his goons grab Boerth. But the overall layout of that part of the ship isn’t nearly as precise as it is for most of the other onboard sets in the movie.

    The landing approach at Lakehurst is also completely wrong, with the ship making its final approach to the mast from the same direction as Hangar One.


  16. Well played, sir! Well played indeed.

    The juxtaposition of the screen captures with actual photos is an excellent touch, and it’s really interesting to look at a lot of these people side by side with their onscreen counterparts. It occurs to me once again what a damned shame it was that they were so sloppy and lazy with the script, because visually they had a lot of this stuff nailed. The photos of Spehl and Boerth are particularly striking in their similarity.

    The sabotage theory was, of course, nonsense. However, from a dramatic standpoint there wasn’t a lot of story to tell about that last Hindenburg flight until the fire broke out, and then it was all over in about half a minute. So while I don’t agree with the choice to go with a sabotage story in terms of historical accuracy, as a writer I can see why they went that way.

    There is actually a new Hindenburg movie (made-for TV this time) being filmed over in Germany as we speak. I don’t know a lot of details about it, other than the fact that it’s another sabotage story (this time I think it may be based on an industrial espionage angle, but I’m not sure) and that they’ll be doing a lot of the effects in CGI. It’s a German production that will air on German television, but there also seem to be plans for a US release of some kind as well. They have several American actors in the cast (including Stacy Keach) and I have to assume that they’re looking to have this movie broadcast here in the States sometime after the German broadcast (which is scheduled for early 2011.)

    It will be interesting to see how this new film turns out, and how it compares to the old one from 1975.


  17. Very nice, well done, don’t believe what you hear and half of what you see! Keeps the History of airships right on keel. rick


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.